[Eisfair] Antispam filtert alles von gmx aus

[René Hanke]

Hallo!

Ich habe den aktuellen antispam mit dem aktuellen antispam-razor in 
Betrieb. Das funktioniert auch prima.

Leider werden aber von diesem seit mindestens einem halben Jahr *alle* 
Mails von gmx, egal ob *@gmx.de oder *@gmx.net heraus gefiltert.

SPAM-Header sehen z.B. so aus:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
X-Spam-Score: 6.6 (++++++)
[...]

  Content analysis details:   (6.6 points, 5.0 required)

   pts rule name              description
  ---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
   3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                              [92.73.189.63 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
   0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP 
address
                              [92.73.189.63 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
   0.5 RCVD_IN_SEMBLACK       RBL: Received from an IP listed by SEM-BLACK
                              [92.73.189.63 listed in 
bl.spameatingmonkey.net]
   1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT   RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
                              [92.73.189.63 listed in 
bb.barracudacentral.org]
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser 
mail provider
                              ([...][at]gmx.de)
   0.0 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
  [SPF failed: Please see 
http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=[...]gmx.de;ip=92.73.189.63;r=frox.home]
  -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                              [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host 
with no rDNS
   0.0 TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT       To: misformatted + percentage
   2.5 TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT     To: misformatted and direct-to-MX
   0.0 T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF     MS document or PDF attachment, from freemail
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
X-Spam-Score: 7.8 (+++++++)
[...]

  Content analysis details:   (7.8 points, 5.0 required)

   pts rule name              description
  ---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
   3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                              [109.90.142.0 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
   0.5 RCVD_IN_SEMBLACK       RBL: Received from an IP listed by SEM-BLACK
                              [109.90.142.0 listed in 
bl.spameatingmonkey.net]
   0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser 
mail provider
                              ([...][at]gmx.de)
   0.0 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
  [SPF failed: Please see 
http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=[...]gmx.de;ip=109.90.142.0;r=frox.home]
  -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                              [score: 0.0000]
   0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host 
with no rDNS
   2.6 TO_EQ_FM_DOM_SPF_FAIL  To domain == From domain and external SPF
                              failed
   2.5 TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT     To: misformatted and direct-to-MX
   0.0 T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF     MS document or PDF attachment, from freemail
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Kann man da irgendetwas machen *ohne* *@gmx.net und *@gmx.de in die 
whitelist einzutragen?


Gruß und Dank

René