[PragmaticWeb] Upper ontologies

[Sebastian Samaruga]

thinking it up a little, it seems 'upper ontologies' should be dynamic
(semantic) by nature. please read the last paragraphs of this document:

https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics/blob/
master/Document.pdf?raw=true

If we need 'upper ontologies' why not stay with relational databases and
views / queries, for example, without needing rigid schemas again. Even OOP
provides us yet the concept of alignment to a class hierarchy.

Obviously this is only a SW 'hobbyist' opinion,

Best,
Sebastián Samaruga
---
http://exampledotorg.blogspot.com.ar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/pipermail/pragmaticweb/attachments/20171118/f3f1d566/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Document.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 244299 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/pipermail/pragmaticweb/attachments/20171118/f3f1d566/attachment-0001.pdf>