[PragmaticWeb] [topicmapmail] Business Applications

Patrick Durusau patrick at durusau.net
Sun Aug 19 17:08:12 CEST 2012


Quintin,

On 08/19/2012 07:10 AM, Quintin Siebers wrote:
> Hey,
>
> We've been working on such a system for a few years now, and our 
> current version is open to have a look at:
>
> http://en.mssm.nl/software/kamala-in-the-cloud/
>

Good point but Kamala requires (as any topic map application does) that 
you establish what subjects you want to talk about, their identifies, 
relationships, etc. Having said that, you can fill it with whatever 
content you like.

My objection to Sebastian's needs/features is their universal nature.

If I were writing a topic map for business expenses, it would be very 
unlikely to include the rules for receipts written in cuneiform (the 
earliest business document is a receipt for beer at an inn). Not that 
topic maps can't do that, but most clients are unlikely to be 
interested. For that matter, of the thousands of natural languages in 
existence, most clients are going to be interested in only one (1). 
Topic maps can do more but again, probably not a requirement.

You can see where this is going.

I think topic maps shine brightest meeting the semantic requirements of 
actual customers.

That someone, somewhere, off the Net most likely, is not best served by 
my topic map is quite likely.

But, I am not arrogant enough to presume to act in their best interest, 
never having asked what they want, much less their permission.

Is the "digital divide" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divide) 
the new "white man's burden? 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Man%27s_Burden)"

Hope you are having a great weekend!

Patrick


> Quintin Siebers
>
> --
> q.siebers at mssm.nl <mailto:q.siebers at mssm.nl>
> (+31) (0)6 - 11 06 16 27
>
>
> Morpheus Kennistechnologie BV
> <URL: http://www.mssm.nl >
> postbus 69
> 3500 CD Utrecht
> KVK 30 26 04 30
>
> On 19 aug. 2012, at 13:03, Alexander Johannesen 
> <alexander.johannesen at gmail.com 
> <mailto:alexander.johannesen at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hola,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:52 PM, adasal <adam.saltiel at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:adam.saltiel at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Is what you are proposing really possible from the ground up? I 
>>> wonder if
>>> even getting an architecture is possible from the ground up, i.e. 
>>> without
>>> starting with real world compromises dictated by the job in hand.
>>
>> Not sure if what's proposed is possible from the ground up, but I know
>> it's certainly possible to create an ontology-based complete system,
>> however I doubt "from the ground up" has been defined enough at this
>> point. I've worked on creating full-stack application and systems
>> delivery framework based on ontologies / Topic Maps, both in terms of
>> integration but also as a development tool, and as a way to infer
>> capabilities of services based on their entity / resource rather than
>> clumsy API's.
>>
>> I'm fairly confident that it's the way of the future, but as you
>> probably allude to as well, it's still a bit way off, mostly because
>> whomever comes up with it first or already doing it, are doing it in
>> solitary, much like the TM community watching the spectacle of RDF
>> from the side-lines.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Alex
>> -- 
>> Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
>> --- http://shelter.nu/blog/ 
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> ------------------ 
>> http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---
>> _______________________________________________
>> topicmapmail mailing list
>> topicmapmail at infoloom.com <mailto:topicmapmail at infoloom.com>
>> http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> topicmapmail mailing list
> topicmapmail at infoloom.com
> http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick at durusau.net
Former Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)

Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
Twitter: patrickDurusau

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/pipermail/pragmaticweb/attachments/20120819/6df6f04e/attachment.html>


More information about the PragmaticWeb mailing list