[jacorb-developer] Unexpected behaviour in JacORB 3.6 and 3.6.1(Bug 1011 and 1012)

[Vinicius (Tec)]

Hi Phill,

I've tested the bugs 1011, 1012 and 1014 using the git HEAD of JacORB.
Here's what I found:

Bug1011: Ok, solved.

Bug1012: The issue remains, that is, one of the calls seems not to reach
the server and there is a fifth call that is sent for no apparent
reason. I refactored
this test to fit into the existing regression test framework. Should I
upload this at http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101
<http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1014>2 or commit in the
repository for approval?

Bug1014: The issue remains. As Nick suggested at
http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1014, it can be solved by
using duplicate. The problem for us is this workaround is not a suitable
solution since our project is not a closed application but a framework
instead, and to avoid the users from sharing objects between threads is
impractical. All we can do for now is to advert that doing this can lead to
the reported behavior.

Kind regards,
Vinicius


2015-08-07 7:32 GMT-03:00 Hugo Roenick <hroenick at gmail.com>:

> FYI
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Phil Mesnier <mesnier_p at ociweb.com>
> > Subject: Re: [jacorb-developer] Unexpected behaviour in JacORB 3.6 and
> 3.6.1(Bug 1011 and 1012)
> > Date: July 14, 2015 at 1:58:12 PM GMT-3
> > To: Hugo Roenick <hroenick at gmail.com>
> > Cc: JacORB Developer <jacorb-developer at lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de>
> >
> > Hi Hugo,
> >
> >> On Jul 14, 2015, at 6:38 AM, Hugo Roenick <hroenick at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> If I can help, please notice me…
> >>
> >
> > It would be great if you could refactor your tests to fit into the
> existing regression test framework as Bug1011Test and Bug1012Test,
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > --
> > Phil Mesnier
> > Principal Software Engineer and Partner,   http://www.ociweb.com
> > Object Computing, Inc.                     +01.314.579.0066 x225
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>