<html>
<head>
<base href="http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - The duplicate ORB related classe for Jacorb 3.7 and IBM thinclient-8.5.5.7, whcih casue the our EJB accessing failed."
href="http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1033#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - The duplicate ORB related classe for Jacorb 3.7 and IBM thinclient-8.5.5.7, whcih casue the our EJB accessing failed."
href="http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1033">bug 1033</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:weifeng.f.huangfu@nokia.com" title="weifeng.f.huangfu@nokia.com">weifeng.f.huangfu@nokia.com</a>
</span></b>
<pre>hi,
Are you able to test different versions of JacORB to narrow down the problem
for me?
----- I am trying to do such testing recently, I will give feedback soon.
Is there a particular reason (apart from having JacORB's stubs first) that you
are putting JacORB first in the classpath?
----- As I mentioned, we cannot control it loading order for classing loading.
it depends ServiceMix.
Have you reported the issue to IBM to ask why their libraries need to be first
in the classpath?
----- No, I haven't reported it to IBM, because I have no enough information
for IBM.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>